“RIDIN’ DOWN THE HIGHWAY” - REFLECTIONS ON THE TRAJECTORIES OF WOMEN PROFESSORS IN ACADEMIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2022150202

Keywords:

women, career success, academic success, gender, accounting

Abstract

The meaning of career success has been researched in diverse settings and time frames. Inquiries addressing gender find that women evaluate their success in distinct ways, which tend to be different from those used by males (Dyke & Murphy, 2006). Research also demonstrates that academic women struggle to perceive themselves successful using the standard social criteria (Hoskins, 2010, 2012), a struggle that is even harder in predominantly male areas, which have rites, symbols and rhythms not build by/for women. This situation may lead to an undervaluation of women’s success in academia, related to the idea of partial success, in which objective success implies failures, drawbacks or negative consequences to other dimensions of women's lives. Bearing this in mind, my purpose is to better understand how academic women perceive their success in accounting academia in Brazil, a predominantly male area. In order to attain this goal, I examine trajectories of four female successful accounting professors in Brazil. I used a qualitative approach based on in depth interviews. My analysis allows to conclude that, to the same extent they are successful considering the so-called objective success criteria (Hoskins, 2010), by deeply examining barriers and boosters they faced during their journey, we realize the cost paid utter to a “long way to the top” but the compensations make possible “ridin’ down the highway.” More importantly, specific policies and actions would help to change the current situation by reducing costs or challenging traditional criteria used to evaluate success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrade, R. O. (2018). Maternidade no currículo: projeto de pesquisadoras estima impacto das atividades como mãe na carreira científica. Revista FAPESP, 269, 87-90.

Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty Preparing Graduate School as Socialization to Academic Career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2002.0001

Blay, E. A., & Lang, A. B. D. S. G. (2004). Mulheres na USP: horizontes que se abrem. Editora Humanitas.

Butler, J. (1988). Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519-531. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3207893

Casa Nova, S. P. C. (2014). Contabilidade das mulheres na universidade brasileira: lucros e perdas, ingresso e permanência (The bottom line for women in Brazilian universities: gains and losses, entry and tenure). Tese de Livre Docência, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.12.2018.tde-06022018-173811

CFC (Conselho Federal de Contabilidade). (2014). Profissionais Ativos nos Conselhos Regionais de Contabilidade agrupados por Gênero. Retrieved from http://www3.cfc.org.br/spw/crcs/ConsultaPorRegiao.aspx?Tipo=0

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES - Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel). (2012).

De Kleijn, M, Jayabalasingham, B, Falk-Krzesinski, HJ, Collins, T, Kuiper-Hoyng, L, Cingolani, I, Zhang, J, Roberge, G, et al (March, 2020). The Researcher Journey Through a Gender Lens: An Examination of Research Participation, Career Progression and Perceptions Across the Globe. Elsevier. www.elsevier.com/gender-report

Dyke, Lorraine S., & Murphy, Steven A. (2006). How we define success: A qualitative study of what matters most to women and men. Sex Roles, 55 (5-6), 357-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9091-2

Emerald Publishing. (2022). Breaking the bias for women in academia: Our global survey shows women face significant challenges when it comes to gender equality. https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/breaking-bias-women-academia

Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M., Uzzi, B., & Alonzo, J. (1994). The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 266 (5182), 51–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7939644

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.

Hart, J. (2006). Women and Feminism in Higher Scholarship: An Analysis Education of Three Core Journals. The Journal of Higher Education, 77 (1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778918

Hart, J., & Fellabaum, J. (2008). Analyzing campus climate studies: Seeking to define and understand. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1 (4), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013627

Haynes, K. (2008). (Re) figuring accounting and maternal bodies: the gendered embodiment of accounting professionals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 328-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.04.003

Hoskins, K. (2010, April). The price of success? The experiences of three senior working class female academics in the UK. Women's Studies International Forum. 33 (2), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2009.12.003

Hoskins, K. (2012). Women and success: professors in the UK academy. Trentham Books.

Jackson, J. F. L., & O’Callaghan, E. M. (2009). What Do We Know About Glass Ceiling Effects? A Taxonomy and Critical Review to Inform Higher Education Research. Research in Higher Education, 50 (5), 460–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9128-9

Kelly, E. L. (2006). Managing flexible work arrangements in US organizations: formalized discretion or “a right to ask.” Socio-Economic Review, 4 (3), 379–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwl001

Kezar, A. & Lester, J. (2009). Leadership in a World of Divided Feminism. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 1 (1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-7890.1004

Kohlstedt, S. G. (1978). In from the Periphery: American Women in Science, 1830-1880. Signs, 4 (1), 81–96

Lehman, C. (1992). “Herstory” in accounting: The first eighty years. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(3-4), 261-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90024-M

Lehman, C. (2012). We've come a long way! Maybe! Re-imagining gender and accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(2), 256-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211198764

Luttrel, W. (ed.). (2010). Qualitative educational research: readings in reflexive methodology and transformative practice. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Mavin, S. & Bryan, P. (2002) Academic women in the UK: Mainstreaming our experiences and networking for action. Gender and Education, 14(3), 235−250. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025022000010703

Nganga, C. S. N., Gouveia, W. M. & Casa Nova, S. P. C. (2018). Unchanging element in a changing world? Women in accounting academy. Congresso USP de Controladoria e Contabilidade, 18, São Paulo, São Paulo. https://congressousp.fipecafi.org/anais/18UspInternational/ArtigosDownload/957.pdf

Nganga, C. S. N., Casa Nova, S. P. C., Silva, S. M. C., & Lima, J. P. R. (2021). Há tanta vida lá fora! Work-life Conflict, Mulheres e Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade. Anais do XLV Encontro da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2021, On-line, 4-8 out.

Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (2008). Women in science — passion and prejudice. Current Biology, 11 March, 18(5): R185-R187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.052

Parent in Science (2018). Um estudo detalhado sobre o impacto da maternidade na carreira científica das mulheres brasileiras. I Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Maternidade e Ciência, Porto Alegre, RS.

Park, S. M. (1996). Research, Teaching, and Service: Why Shouldn’t Women's Work Count? The Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 46–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943903

Pierro, B. (2013). Territórios femininos: pesquisa mostra que mulheres já publica mais artigos, mas avanço é lento em algumas áreas em posições de maior prestígio. Pesquisa FAPESP, Outubro, 212: 32-35. https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/territorios-femininos/

Ropers-Huilman, R., & Winters, K. T. (2011). Feminist Research in Higher Education. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(6), 667–690. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0035

Rossi, A. S. (1965). Women in Science: Why So Few?: Social and psychological influences restrict women’s choice and pursuit of careers in science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 148(3674), 1196–202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3674.1196

Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean In: women, work, and the will to lead (with Nell Scovell). Alfred A. Knopf.

Scott, J. (1995). Gênero: uma categoria útil de análise histórica. Educação & realidade, 20(2). https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/71721

Silva, S. M. C. (2016). Tetos de vitrais: gênero e raça na contabilidade no Brasil. Tese de Doutorado, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.12.2016.tde-03082016-111152

Silva, S. M. C. (2019). Nenhum Saber a Menos!. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestão, 14(4), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.21446/scg_ufrj.v14i4.31348

Slaughter, A. Can’t Have, W. W. S. (2012, July/August). The Atlantic Monthly.

Staniscuaski, F., Zandonà, E., Reichert, F., Soletti, R. C., Oliveira, L. D., Ricachenevsky, F. K., ... & Mello-Carpes, P. B. (2021). Maternity in the Brazilian CV Lattes: when will it become a reality?. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 93. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120201370

Style, E. (1996). Curriculum as window and mirror. Social science record, 33(2), 21-28.

West, J. D., Jacquet, J., King, M. M., Correll, S. J., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PloS one, 8(7), e66212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066212

Van Maanen, J. (1998). Qualitative studies of organizations (Vol. 1). Sage.

Published

2022-11-03

How to Cite

Nova, S. P. de C. C. (2022). “RIDIN’ DOWN THE HIGHWAY” - REFLECTIONS ON THE TRAJECTORIES OF WOMEN PROFESSORS IN ACADEMIA. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 15(2), 030–046/047. https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2022150202

Issue

Section

ARTICLES

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.