Tax Compliance Actions by Tax Authorities and Voluntary Compliance with Tax Obligations by Individual Taxpayers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2024170103Keywords:
Taxpayer Behavior, Slippery Slope Model, Cooperative Compliance, Tax Compliance, Tax ObligationsAbstract
Research objective: Tax compliance actions aim to improve the relationship between the tax authorities and taxpayers, increasing voluntary compliance with tax obligations and reducing administrative and judicial litigation. In this sense, the defined objective was to analyze whether tax compliance actions increase voluntary compliance with tax obligations.
Methodology: Thus, a quantitative approach was used, through analysis of latent classes, carried out on the baseed on longitudinal data from the Federal Revenue, with 531 individual taxpayers, related to compliance action.
Results: After the action, it was found that the taxes owed had a statistically significant increase and the tax gap was increasingly reduced between 2015 and 2018, indicating that the implemented tax compliance actions were effective in promoting voluntary compliance with tax obligations by taxpayers. In addition, the action also presented advantages to taxpayers, since, when there is a spontaneous regularization, there is less possibility of facing a tax procedure, as well as a reduction in administrative costs and the amount of litigation.
Practical and theoretical contributions: The practical contributions are aimed at enhancing future tax compliance initiatives carried out by Federated Entities. Furthermore, the theoretical contribution utilizes the Slippery Slope Model, which illustrates an upsurge in voluntary compliance with tax obligations following a compliance action, attributed to heightened authority and confidence in the tax regulatory body. As a result, this theoretical contribution underscores the significance of the Slippery Slope Model in comprehending taxpayer behavior and in devising more efficient tax compliance strategies.
Downloads
References
Alink, M., & Van Kommer, V. (2011). Manual de administración tributaria (CIAT, IBFD, Amsterdam). Recuperado de https://www.ciat.org/Biblioteca/DocumentosTecnicos/Espanol/2011_CIAT_IBFD_manual_administracion_tributaria_esp.pdf.
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
Almeida, C. O. F. (2017). Compliance cooperativo: uma nova realidade entre administração tributária e contribuintes. RDTI Atual, (2), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-7155-rdtia-n2-4
Alm, J., & Soled, J. A. (2017). W (h) ither the Tax Gap. Wash. L. Rev., 92, 521. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2978215.
Amaral, G. L., Olenike, J. E., Do Amaral, L. M. F., & Yazbek, C. L. (2013). Quantidade de normas editadas no Brasil: 25 anos da Constituição Federal de 1988. Instituto Brasileiro de Planejamento e Tributação. Recuperado de https://ibpt.com.br/quantidade-de-normas-editadas-no-brasil/
Australian Taxation Office. (2019). Compliance Model. Recuperado de https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/managing-the-tax-and-super-system/strategic-direction/how-we-help-and-influence-taxpayers/compliance-model/
Batrancea, L. M., Kudła, J., Błaszczak, B., & Kopyt, M. (2022). Differences in tax evasion attitudes between students and entrepreneurs under the slippery slope framework. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200, 464-482.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.017
Bezerra, T. V. S., Dos Santos, D. B., Cabral, J. E. O., Nogueira, E. S. (2021, outubro). Ação de Conformidade como uma Inovação na Administração Pública Brasileira. In: Anuais do IX Simpósio Internacional de Gestão, Projetos, Inovação e Sustentabilidade (IX SINGEP), São Paulo/SP, Brasil.
Budak, T. (2012). Power and trust as determinants of voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence for the slippery slope framework from Turkey. African Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 1499-1505. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2157
Bradford, B., Huq, A., Jackson, J., & Roberts, B. (2014). What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa. Regulation & governance, 8(2), 246-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12012
Carvalho, P. B. (2017). Curso de direito tributário. 30. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Castelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (2010). Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470519851
Castro, L., & Scartascini, C. (2015). Tax compliance and enforcement in the pampas evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 65-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.002
Ceará. (2021, 27 de outubro). Portal Ceará Transparente. Recuperado de https://cearatransparente.ce.gov.br/portal-da-transparencia/despesas/despesas-do-poder-executivo?stats_month_end=12&stats_month_start=1&stats_year=2019&utf8=%E2%9C%93&locale=pt-BR&__=__.
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2014). Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. (4ª ed.) UK. Palgrave Macmillan Higher Education.
Cremades, L., Isaác, U., Arias, G., & Vargas, E. D. (2015). Cooperative Tax Relationship or Compliance: Current situation in the CIAT member countries of Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa and Asia (Issue March). https://cds.ciat.org/Biblioteca/DocumentosdeTrabajo/2015/2015_WP_2_cooperative_gonzalo_cremades_vargas.pdf
Da Silva, F. P., Guerreiro, R., & Flores, E. (2019). Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: the slippery slope framework in the Brazilian context. International Review of Economics, 66(2), 147-180.
DOI: 10.1007/s12232-019-00321-0
Eberhartinger, E., & Zieser, M. (2021). The Effects of Cooperative Compliance on Firms’ Tax Risk, Tax Risk Management and Compliance Costs. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 73(1), 125-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-021-00108-6nomics of governance, 3(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010100032
Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87-99.
Fontes, D. B. (2020). Abordagem comportamental no compliance tributário. In Anais 19 Prêmio de criatividade e inovação da Receita Federal do Brasil. Brasília, DF.
Fortaleza. (2021, 10 de novembro). Portal da Transparência de Fortaleza. Recuperado de https://transparencia.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/arquivos_pdfs/sepog/LOA/LIVRO_LOA_2019_FINAL.pdf.
Franzoni, L. A. (1998). Tax evasion and tax compliance. Recuperado de http://encyclo.findlaw.com/6020book.pdf
Gangl, K., Muehlbacher, S., de Groot, M., Goslinga, S., Hofmann, E., Kogler, C.,& Kirchler, E. (2013). " How can I help you?" Perceived service orientation of tax authorities and tax compliance. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522113X675683
Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax authorities' interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust. New ideas in psychology, 37, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001
Gangl, K., Hartl, B., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2019). The relationship between Austrian tax auditors and self-employed taxpayers: Evidence from a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01034
Gribnau, Hans, Horizontal Monitoring: Some Procedural Tax Law Issues (January 21, 2015). in R. Russo (ed.), Tax Assurance, Deventer: Kluwer 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2608841
Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Pantya, J., Belianin, A., & Kirchler, E. (2013). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: Testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.010
Haughton, D., Legrand, P., & Woolford, S. (2009). Review of three latent class cluster analysis packages: Latent Gold, poLCA, and MCLUST. The American Statistician, 63(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.0016
Huiskers-Stoop, E., & Gribnau, H. (2019). Cooperative compliance and the Dutch horizontal monitoring model. Journal of Tax Administration, 5, 1. Recuperado de http://jota.website/index.php/JoTA/article/view/219
Ibrahim, F. Z. (2011). Curso de direito previdenciário. Niteroi-RJ. Impetus.
Kastlunger, B., Kirchler, E., Mittone, L., & Pitters, J. (2009). Sequences of audits, tax compliance, and taxpaying strategies. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.10.004
Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic psychology, 29(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
Kirchler, E., & Wahl, I. (2010). Tax compliance inventory TAX-I: Designing an inventory for surveys of tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.002
Lanza, S. T., Collins, L. M., Lemmon, D. R., & Schafer, J. L. (2007). PROC LCA: A SAS procedure for latent class analysis. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 14(4), 671-694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575602
Laureano, R.M.S. (2011). Testes de hipóteses com o SPSS: o meu manual de consulta rápida. Lisboa. Edições Sílabo.
Lemoine, J., & Roland-Lévy, C. (2012). From the slippery slope framework to responsive regulation. Creating communities: local, national and global, London: CICE, 727-739.
Lozza, E., Kastlunger, B., Tagliabue, S., & Kirchler, E. (2013). The relationship between political ideology and attitudes toward tax compliance: The case of Italian taxpayers. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.108
Machado, H. B. (2010). Curso de Direito Tributário. São Paulo – SP: Malheiros.
Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian journal of marketing research, 20(1), 36-43.
Minayo, M. C. D. S., & Sanches, O. (1993). Quantitativo-qualitativo: oposição ou complementaridade?. Cadernos de saúde pública, 9(3), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X1993000300002
Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E., & Schwarzenberger, H. (2011). Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence for the “slippery slope” framework. European Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9236-9
OCDE. (2008). Study into the Role of Tax Intermediaries. Paris. OECD Publishing. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/tax/administration/39882938.pdf
OCDE. (2010). Tax Compliance and Tax Accounting Systems, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration. Paris. OECD Publishing. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/tax/forum-on-tax-administration/publications-and-products/45045662.pdf
OCDE. (2013). Co-operative compliance: a framework: from enhanced relationship to co-operative compliance. Paris. OECD Publishing. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/publications/co-operative-compliance-a-framework-9789264200852-en.htm
Owens, J. (2012). Tax administrators, taxpayers and their advisors: can the dynamics of the relationship be changed. Bulletin for international taxation, 516-518. Recuperado de https://www.wu.ac.at/fileadmin/wu/d/i/taxlaw/institute/staff/publications/bifd091206.pdf
Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 28(4), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01708.x
RFB. (2020, 30 de setembro). Portaria RFB nº 4820, de 19 de novembro de 2020. Aprova o Manual Eletrônico do Sigilo Fiscal da Secretaria Especial da Receita Federal do Brasil (e-MSF). Recuperado de http://normas.receita.fazenda.gov.br/sijut2consulta/consulta.action
Russo, R. (2019). Risk management, internal control and cooperative compliance in taxation. In The Future of Risk Management, Volume I (pp. 329-350). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14548-4_14
Simone, L., Sansing, R. C., & Seidman, J. K. (2013). When are enhanced relationship tax compliance programs mutually beneficial?. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1971-1991. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50525
Solichin, M. R., & Astuti, S. (2021). Tax Payment Intention using Theory of Planned Behavior Approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.32639/jiak.v10i1.723
Szudoczky, R., & Majdanska, A. (2017). Designing co-operative compliance programmes: lessons from the EU State aid rules for tax administrations. British Tax Review, (2), 204-229. Recuperado de https://link.library.ibfd.org/portal/Designing-co-operative-compliance-programmes-/uE9dW5rZ-DI/
Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three‐process theory. European journal of social psychology, 35(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.244
Tyler, Tom R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton - Nova Jérsei. Princeton university press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828609
Ventry Jr, D. J. (2008). Cooperative Tax Regulation, 41 Conn. L. Rev, 431, 461-62. Recuperado de https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/302394401.pdf
Viol, A. L. (2015). A administração tributária moderna e a maximização do cumprimento tributário: algumas reflexões sobre o caso brasileiro. Revista da Receita Federal: estudos tributários e aduaneiros, 1(2), 50-82. Recuperado de https://www.gov.br/receitafederal/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/revistas/revista-da-receita-federal/2015-revista-de-estudos-tributarios-e-aduaneiros-da-receita-federal-1.pdf
Wahl, Ingrid; Kastlunger, Barbara; Kirchler, Erich. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax compliance: an empirical analysis of the “Slippery Slope Framework”. Law & Policy, 32(4),383-406. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00327.x
Warren, N. (2018). Estimating tax gag is everything to an informed response to the digital era. eJTR, 16, 536. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3200838
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Thales Vinícius Santiago Bezerra, Oderlene Vieira de Oliveira, Lucas Lopes Ferreira de Souza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in the ASAA Journal is held by the author, with first publication rights to the journal. By virtue of appearing in this publicly accessible journal, the articles are free to use, with their own attributions, in educational and non-commercial applications. The ASAA Journal will allow the use of published works for non-commercial purposes, including the right to submit the work to publicly accessible databases. Published articles are the authors' full and exclusive responsibility. There are no submission/publishing charges or fees for processing articles (APC).
