The Relationship between Board Gender Diversity in Brazilian Companies and Adhesion to the Carbon Efficient Index
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2023160203Keywords:
Board Gender Diversity, ICO2 Index, Sustainability, Potentially Polluting SectorsAbstract
Objectives: This study investigated the relationship between the presence of women in the Boards of Directors (BDs) and company adhesion to the Carbon Efficient Index (ICO2). Additionally, the study investigated whether company adhesion to the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) increases the likelihood of adhesion to the ICO2.
Method: The study adopted the logistic regression method, given that the dependent variable (ICO2) is binary. The sample included Brazilian companies that are part of the BrX100, and the study period was from 2011 to 2021. The study segmented the companies into two sub-samples: one group composed of potentially more polluting companies, and one group composed of potentially less polluting companies.
Results: We found a positive relationship between the presence of women in BDs and adhesion to ICO2 for the group composed of more polluting companies, and when the BD was presided by a woman, this relationship happened in all subdivisions of the sample. The findings also indicated that companies that are more leveraged and have greater liquidity, greater market value, and more assets, are more likely to be part of the ICO2.
Contributions: The major contribution of this study is the classification of the sample into different groups of sectors related to gas emissions. This study is in line with three of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): gender equality, innovation and action against climate change. In addition, the study is relevant because it showed that the protagonism of women in BDs leads to sustainable, environmentally efficient practices.
Downloads
References
Andrikopoulus, A.; Kriklani, N. (2013). Environmental Disclosure and Financial Characteristics of the Firm: The Case of Denmark. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 55–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csr.1281
Atif, M., Hossain, M., Alam, M.S., & Goergen, M. (2021). Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101665
B3. (2022). Índice Carbono Eficiente - ICO2 B3. Recuperado de https://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/market-data-e-indices/indices/indices-de-sustentabilidade/indice-carbono-eficiente-ico2-b3.htm
Baalouch, F., Ayadi, S. D., & Hussainey, K. (2019). A study of the determinants of environmental disclosure quality: Evidence from French listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 23, 939-971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09474-0
Ben-Amar, W., Chang, M., & McIlkenny, P. (2017). Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project. Journal of Business Ethics, 142, 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1
Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2019). The Impact of Women Leaders on Environmental Performance: Evidence on Gender Diversity in Banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 1485-1499.
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1762
Burkhardt, K., Nguyen, P., & Poincelot, E., (2020). Agents of change: women in top management and corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1591–1604. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1907
Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12165
Clark, C. (2019). Climate change scenario analysis for public market investors. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12353
Charumathi, B., & Rahman, H. (2019) Do Women on Boards Influence Climate Change Disclosures to CDP?. Evidence from Large Indian Companies. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal. 13(2), 5-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v13i2.2
Córdova, C., Zorio-Grima, A., & Merello, P. (2018). Carbon Emissions by South American Companies: Driving Factors for Reporting Decisions and Emissions Reduction. Sustainability, 10(7), 2411. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10072411
Dawar, G., & Singh, S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: A literature review. Journal of IMS Group, 13(1), 61-71.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. Recuperado de https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/INF9200/v10/readings/papers/DeMaggio.pdf
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks – Triple bottom line of 21st century business. Stoney Creek, CT: New Society Publishers.
Elmagrhi, M., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250
Elsayih, J., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y. C. (2018). Corporate governance and carbon transparency: Australian experience. Accounting Research Journal, 31(3), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-12-2015-0153
Fernández-Temprano, M.A., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2020), Types of director, board diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance, 20(2), 324-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2019-0096
Freitas, M. R. O., Souza, J. L., Fontenele, R.E. S., & Rebouças S. M. D. P. (2018). Determinantes do Desempenho de Ecoeficiência Corporativa e a Criação de Valor às Empresas Brasileiras. Revista Universo Contábil, 4(4), 137-159. https://doi.org.doi:10.4270/ruc.2018431
Galia, F., Zenou, E., & Ingham, M. (2015). Board composition and environmental innovation: Does gender diversity matter?. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 24(1), 117-141. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2015.066152
Gallego-Alvarez, I., Segura, L., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2015). Carbon emission reduction: The impact on the financial and operational performance of international companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.047
García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2020). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1775
García-Sánchez, I. M., Monteiro, S., Piñeiro-Chousa, J.R., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2023). Climate change innovation: Does board gender diversity matter? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3),100372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100372.
Giannarakis, G. (2014). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(5), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-05-2013-0021
Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A.R. (2016). Do Women Leaders Promote Sustainability? Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1879
Goloshchapova, I., Poon, S.-H., Pritchard, M., & Reed, P. (2019). Corporate social responsibility reports: Topic analysis and big data approach. The European Journal of Finance, 25, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2019.1572637
Hafsi, T., & Turgut G. (2013). Boardroom Diversity and its Effect on Social Performance: Conceptualization and Empirical Evidence, 112, 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z
Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., & Schiemann, F. (2015). Organizations, Climate Change, and Transparency: Reviewing the Literature on Carbon Disclosure. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575542
Haque, F. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.01.001
Haque, F., & Jones, J. (2020). European firms' corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity from 2002 to 2016. The British Accounting Review, 52(2), 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100893
Hasan, I., Kobeissi, N., Liu, L., & Wang, H., (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Productivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3066-1
Hassan, R., & Marimuthu, M. (2018). Contextualizing comprehensive board diversity and firm financial performance: Integrating market, management and shareholder’s perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(5), 634-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.10
He, R., Zhou, M., Liu, J., & Yang, Q. (2021). Female directors and carbon information disclosure: Evidence from china. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 1-16. https://doi:10.1155/2021/7772601
He, X., & Jiang, S. (2019). Does gender diversity matter for green innovation?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1341-1356. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2319
Hillman A. J., Shropshire C. & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279222
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource Dependence Theory: A Review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404-1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
Jitmaneeroj, B. (2018). A latent variable analysis of corporate social responsibility and firm value. Managerial Finance, 44(4), 478-494. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2017-0303
Khatri, I. (2023). Board gender diversity and sustainability performance: Nordic evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1495-1507. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2432
Khlif, W., Karoui, L., & Ingley, C. (2022). Introduction to the special issue: “corporate governance of sustainability”. Journal of Management and Governance, 26, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09623-y
Konadu R., Ahinful, G. Sam., Boakye, D. J., & Elbardan H. (2022). Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279
Krishnamurtia, C.; Velayuthamn, E. (2017). The influence of board committee structures on voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Australian evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 50, 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.09.003
Li, J., Zhao, F., Chen, S., Jiang, W., Liu, T., & Shi, S. (2017). Gender diversity on boards and firms' environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 306-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1918
Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
Liao, Z., Zhang, M., & Wang, X. (2019). Do female directors influence firms’ environmental innovation? The moderating role of ownership type. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1677
Lima, A. T. F., Mota, R. H. G., Prado, A. G. S., & Oliveira, M. F. (2020). Análise do Disclosure Ambiental das Empresas Listadas no Índice Carbono Eficiente (ICO2): Participantes Potencialmente Poluidores. Revista De Contabilidade Da UFBA, 14(2), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.9771/rc-ufba.v14i2.35190
Liu, C. (2018). Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 118-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.004
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1449-1464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2326
Luo, L., Lan, Y. C. & Tang, Q. (2012). Corporate Incentives to Disclose Carbon Information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 Report. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 23, 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-646X.2012.01055.x
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Naciti, V., Cesaroni, F., & Pulejo, L. (2022). Corporate governance and sustainability: a review of the existing literature. Journal of Management and Governance, 26, 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09554-6
Nuber, C., & Velte, P. (2021). Board gender diversity and carbon emissions: European evidence on curvilinear relationships and critical mass. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 1958-1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2727
Peixoto, F. M., Castro, F. E. M. F., & Sampaio, D. O. (2022). O reflexo da diversidade do conselho de administração sobre as práticas ambientalmente responsáveis: uma análise das empresas pertencentes ao Índice Carbono Eficiente – ICO2. XLVI Encontro da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2022, 2177-2576. Recuperado de http://anpad.com.br/uploads/articles/120/approved/34adeb8e3242824038aa65460a47c29e.pdf
Peng, J., Sun, J., & Luo, R. (2015). Corporate voluntary carbon information disclosure: Evidence from China's listed companies. The World Economy, 38(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12187
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York.
Presidência da República, Casa Civil, Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos. (2000). Lei nº 10.165, de 27 de Dezembro de 2000. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l10165.htm#:~:text=LEI%20No%2010.165%2C%20DE%2027%20DE%20DEZEMBRO%20DE%202000.&text=Altera%20a%20Lei%20no,aplica%C3%A7%C3%A3o%2C%20e%20d%C3%A1%20outras%20provid%C3%AAncias.
Prudêncio, P., Forte, H., Crisóstomo, V., & Vasconcelos, A. (2021). Efeito da Diversidade do Conselho de Administração e da Diretoria Executiva na Responsabilidade Social Corporativa. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 18, 118-139. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2021.18.2.1
Qian, W., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views. The British Accounting Review, 49(4), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005
Quadrelli, R., & Peterson, S. (2007). The energy–climate challenge: recent trends in CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5938–5952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.001
Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 351-366. https://doi-org.ez34.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9
Rickards, L., Wiseman, J., & Kashima, Y. (2014). Barriers to effective climate change mitigation: the case of senior government and business decision makers. WIREs Clim Change, 5, 753-773. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.305
Rjiba H., & Thavaharan T. (2022). Female representation on boards and carbon emissions: International evidence. Finance Research Letters. (49), 103079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103079
Rosa, F. S., Guesser, T., Hein, N., Pfitscher E. D. & Lunkes R. J. (2015). Environmental impact management of Brazilian companies: analyzing factors that influence disclosure of waste, emissions, effluents, and other impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.035.
Silva, L. K. S. (2020). Mais é melhor! Mulheres no conselho de administração e a divulgação de responsabilidade social corporativa relacionada a gênero (Dissertação de Mestrado em Administração e Controladoria). Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Atuária e Contabilidade, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brasil. Recuperado de http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/53136
S&P 500 Carbon Efficient Index (S&P 500). (2022). Recuperado de https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/esg/sp-500-carbon-efficient-index/#overview
Tauringana, V. & Chithambo, L. (2015). The effect of DEFRA guidance on greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47, 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.07.002
Teixeira, E. A., Nossa, V., & Funchal B. (2011). O índice de sustentabilidade empresarial (ISE) e os impactos no endividamento e na percepção de risco. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças - USP, 22(55), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772011000100003
Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women Directos and Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An internal Review, 17(3), 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
Tingbani, I., Chithambo, L., & Papanikolaou, N. (2020). Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2194-2210. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2495
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Recuperado de https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_Full_Report.pdf
Toukabri, M. & Jilani, F. (2022). The power of critical mass to make a difference: how gender diversity in board affect US corporate carbon performance. Society and Business Review, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-11-2021-0224
Vafaei, A., Ahmed, K., & Mather, P. (2015). Board Diversity and Financial Performance in the Top 500 Australian Firms. Australian Accounting Review, 25(4), 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12068
Valls Martínez, M.C., & Rambaud, S. C. (2019). Women on corporate boards and firm’s financial performance. Women's Studies International Forum, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102251
Valls Martínez, M.C., Rambaud, S. C., & Oller, I. M. P. (2019). Gender policies on board of directors and sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsability and Enviroment Management, 26, 1539-1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1825
Valls Martínez, M. C., Santos-Jaén, J. M., Soriano Román, R., & Martin-Cervantes, P. (2022). Are gender and cultural diversities on board related to corporate CO2 emissions?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132638
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Velte, P. (2017). Do women on boards of directors have an impact on corporate governance quality and firm performance? A literature review. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, 5(4), 302-346. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2017.089125
Velte, P., Stawinoga, M., & Lueg, R. (2020). Carbon performance and disclosure: A systematic review of governance-related determinants and financial consequences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120063
Wallace, S., Naser, K.H., & Mora, A. (1994). The Relationship Between the Comprehensiveness of Corporate Annual Reports and Firm Characteristics in Spain. Accounting and Business Research, 25, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1994.9729927
Walls, J.L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P.H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 885-913. https://doi-org.ez34.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1002/smj.1952
Wang, H., Tang, Q., & Guo, T. (2023). Board Gender Diversity and Carbon Proactivity: The Influence of Cultural Factors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(2), 131. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16020131
Wright, C. & Nyberg, D. (2017). An Inconvenient Truth: How Organizations Translate Climate Change into Business As Usual. The Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1633-1661. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0718
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anderson Luís Firmino, Fernanda Maciel Peixoto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in the ASAA Journal is held by the author, with first publication rights to the journal. By virtue of appearing in this publicly accessible journal, the articles are free to use, with their own attributions, in educational and non-commercial applications. The ASAA Journal will allow the use of published works for non-commercial purposes, including the right to submit the work to publicly accessible databases. Published articles are the authors' full and exclusive responsibility. There are no submission/publishing charges or fees for processing articles (APC).
