DECENTRALIZATION OF BUDGET EXPENDITURE EXECUTION AND ITS EFFECT ON MUNICIPAL SPENDING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2021140105Keywords:
Descentralização, gasto público, despesa pública, escolha públicaAbstract
Objective: The research aimed to investigate the effect of purchasing decentralization on municipal
spending, through the theoretical lens of Public Choice Theory.
Method: The analysis was developed using quantile regression performed with data obtained from an electronic questionnaire, analyzed together with data from city halls from 2013 to 2018, considering expenditures with different pressures and budget constraints.
Results or Discussion: The results indicate that in areas with enough linkages, decentralization lowers spending; in areas with insufficient linkages and high social pressure, it presented the opposite result, an increase, with no effect in areas without linkages and low pressure. Through the adopted theoretical lens, the decisions in the public sector does not necessarily follow a logic of well-being, but are influenced by other factors, such as self-interest of the actors. However, the decision does not depend solely on individual aspects and can be influenced also by organizational aspects, such as the decentralization of the implementation of budget expenditure.
Contributions: The results bring three contributions. First, by discussing the effect of practices that are in use in governments, often automatically, it allows for greater reflection on the decisions of the organization of these practices. Second, it draws attention to the effects caused by the budget linkage, which should be considered by the surveys, given the specificities of each linkage. Third, even when having autonomy over purchases, managers of decentralized units tend to seek efficiency only when the resources allocated to their areas are sufficient. Thus, the research suggests the existence of an effect organizational moderator in the search for maximization.
Downloads
References
Aboelazm, K.S., & Afandy, A. (2018). Centralization and decentralization of public procurement: analysis for the role of General Authority for Governmental Services (GAGS) in Egypt. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(3), 262-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-05-2018-0049
Arretche, M., & Vazquez, D. (2009, junho). Descentralização, instituições políticas e autonomia: padrões de gasto dos governos locais no Brasil. In Anais do 28o Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (pp. 1-24), Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Recuperado de http://www.unsam.edu.ar/profesores/ricardogutierrez/LASA09_Arretche&Vazquez.pdf
Asatryan, Z., Feld, L.P., & Geys, B. (2015). Partial fiscal decentralization and sub-national government fiscal discipline: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Public Choice, 163(3/4), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0250-2
Avarte, P., & Biderman, C. (2004). Economia do Setor Público no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Elsevier.
Azevedo, R. R., & Cabello, O. G. (2020). Controle e transparência sobre os gastos tributários em municípios brasileiros. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestão, 15(2), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.21446/scg_ufrj.v0i0.22220
Baião, A.L., Cunha, A.S.M., & Souza, F.S.R.N. (2017). Papel das transferências intergovernamentais na equalização fiscal dos municípios brasileiros. Revista do Serviço Público, 68(3), 583-610. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v68i3.1406
Baldi, S., & Vannoni, D. (2015). The impact of centralization on pharmaceutical procurement prices: the role of institutional quality and corruption. Regional Studies, 51(3), 426-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1101517
Bowling, C.J., Cho, C.L., & Wright, D.S. (2004). Establishing a continuum from minimizing to maximizing bureaucrats. Public Administration Review, 64(4), 489-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00394.x
Brasil. (1964). Lei n. 4.320, de 17 de março de 1964. Estatui Normas Gerais de Direito Financeiro para elaboração e contrôle dos orçamentos e balanços da União, dos Estados, dos Municípios e do Distrito Federal. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l4320.htm
Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/ConstituicaoCompilado.htm
Brezovnik, B., Oplotnik, Ž. J., & Vojinović, B. (2015). (De)centralization of public procurement at the local level in the EU. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 46, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1101517
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Indianópolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Recuperado de http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1063
Ckagnazaroff, I. B., & Mota, N. R. (2003). Considerações sobre a relação entre descentralização e intersetorialidade como estratégias de modernização de prefeituras municipais. E & G Economia e Gestão, 3(6), 23-41. Recuperado de http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/article/view/94
Dantas, A. F., Jr., Diniz, J. A., & Lima, S. C. (2019). A influência do federalismo fiscal sobre o estresse fiscal dos municípios brasileiros. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 12(3), 62–78. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2019120304
Davis, O. A., Dempster, M. A. H., & Wildavsky, A. (1966). A theory of the budgetary process. The American Political Science Review, 60(3), 529-547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1952969
Downs, A. (1964). Inside bureaucracy. Santa Mônica, CA: RAND Corporation (pp. 29-63). Recuperado de https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2963.html
Duarte, F. C. L., Girão, L. F. A. P., & Paulo, E. (2017). Avaliando modelos lineares de value relevance: eles captam o que deveriam captar? Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 21(spe), 110-134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2017160202
Giacomoni, J. (2019). Orçamento governamental: teoria, sistema, processo. São Paulo, SP: Atlas.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2019). Conceitos e métodos: metadados. Brasília, DF: IBGE. Recuperado de https://metadados.ibge.gov.br/consulta/estatisticos/temas
IMF. (2018). Fiscal monitor: capitalizing on good times. Washington, DC: IMF. Recuperado de https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2018/04/06/fiscal-monitor-april-2018
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1913643
Lino, A. F., & Aquino, A. C. B. (2018). A diversidade dos tribunais de contas regionais na auditoria de governos. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 29(76), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201803640
Medina, A. V. A. (1987). Tarefas ou poder: o que descentralizar? Cadernos de Pesquisa, 60, 45-47. Recuperado de http://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/cp/article/view/1233
Morais, L. M. F., Sarmento, T. L. F., Diniz, J. A., & Queiroz, D. B. (2018, julho). Determinantes dos gastos públicos dos municípios brasileiros. In Anais do 18o USP International conference in accounting, São Paulo, SP. Recuperado de https://congressousp.fipecafi.org/anais/Anais2018/ArtigosDownload/934.pdf
Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. New Brunswick, NB: Aldine Transaction.
Orchard, L., & Stretton, H. (1997). Public choice. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21(3), 409-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013678
Pimenta, C. C. (1995). Novos modelos de gestão descentralizada e de parcerias para as administrações estaduais. Revista de Administração Pública, 29(3), 171-187. Recuperado de http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rap/article/view/8194
Pinho, A. (2019). Gasto de saúde sobe além do mínimo e ameaça verba municipal de educação. São Paulo, Folha de São Paulo. Recuperado de https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/educacao/2019/11/gasto-de-saude-sobe-alem-do-minimo-e-ameaca-verba-municipal-de-educacao.shtml
Rickards, R. C. (1984). How the spending patterns of cities change: budgetary incrementalism reexamined. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 4(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3323854
Sacchi, A., & Salotti, S. (2016). A comprehensive analysis of expenditure decentralization and of the composition of local public spending. Regional Studies, 50(1), 93-109. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.893387
SICONFI. (2019). Consultas. Brasília, DF. Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional. Recuperado de https://siconfi.tesouro.gov.br/siconfi/index.jsf;jsessionid=yU8dunwocDUE7g5rfg81pgqZ.node3
SIOPS. (2019). Contatos. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde. Recuperado de http://siops.datasus.gov.br/consconselho.php
Tribunal Superior Eleitoral. (2019). Calendário eleitoral – Eleições. Brasília, DF: TSE. Recuperado de http://www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/calendario-eleitoral/calendario-eleitoral
Yin, R. K. (2001). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos (2a ed.). Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in the ASAA Journal is held by the author, with first publication rights to the journal. By virtue of appearing in this publicly accessible journal, the articles are free to use, with their own attributions, in educational and non-commercial applications. The ASAA Journal will allow the use of published works for non-commercial purposes, including the right to submit the work to publicly accessible databases. Published articles are the authors' full and exclusive responsibility. There are no submission/publishing charges or fees for processing articles (APC).