Tax Compliance Actions by Tax Authorities and Voluntary Compliance with Tax Obligations by Individual Taxpayers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2024170103

Keywords:

Taxpayer Behavior, Slippery Slope Model, Cooperative Compliance, Tax Compliance, Tax Obligations

Abstract

Research objective: Tax compliance actions aim to improve the relationship between the tax authorities and taxpayers, increasing voluntary compliance with tax obligations and reducing administrative and judicial litigation. In this sense, the defined objective was to analyze whether tax compliance actions increase voluntary compliance with tax obligations.

Methodology: Thus, a quantitative approach was used, through analysis of latent classes, carried out on the baseed on longitudinal data from the Federal Revenue, with 531 individual taxpayers, related to compliance action.

Results: After the action, it was found that the taxes owed had a statistically significant increase and the tax gap was increasingly reduced between 2015 and 2018, indicating that the implemented tax compliance actions were effective in promoting voluntary compliance with tax obligations by taxpayers. In addition, the action also presented advantages to taxpayers, since, when there is a spontaneous regularization, there is less possibility of facing a tax procedure, as well as a reduction in administrative costs and  the amount of litigation.

Practical and theoretical contributions: The practical contributions are aimed at enhancing future tax compliance initiatives carried out by Federated Entities. Furthermore, the theoretical contribution utilizes the Slippery Slope Model, which illustrates an upsurge in voluntary compliance with tax obligations following a compliance action, attributed to heightened authority and confidence in the tax regulatory body. As a result, this theoretical contribution underscores the significance of the Slippery Slope Model in comprehending taxpayer behavior and in devising more efficient tax compliance strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alink, M., & Van Kommer, V. (2011). Manual de administración tributaria (CIAT, IBFD, Amsterdam). Recuperado de https://www.ciat.org/Biblioteca/DocumentosTecnicos/Espanol/2011_CIAT_IBFD_manual_administracion_tributaria_esp.pdf.

Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2

Almeida, C. O. F. (2017). Compliance cooperativo: uma nova realidade entre administração tributária e contribuintes. RDTI Atual, (2), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-7155-rdtia-n2-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-7155-rdtia-n2-4

Alm, J., & Soled, J. A. (2017). W (h) ither the Tax Gap. Wash. L. Rev., 92, 521. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2978215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2978215

Amaral, G. L., Olenike, J. E., Do Amaral, L. M. F., & Yazbek, C. L. (2013). Quantidade de normas editadas no Brasil: 25 anos da Constituição Federal de 1988. Instituto Brasileiro de Planejamento e Tributação. Recuperado de https://ibpt.com.br/quantidade-de-normas-editadas-no-brasil/

Australian Taxation Office. (2019). Compliance Model. Recuperado de https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/managing-the-tax-and-super-system/strategic-direction/how-we-help-and-influence-taxpayers/compliance-model/

Batrancea, L. M., Kudła, J., Błaszczak, B., & Kopyt, M. (2022). Differences in tax evasion attitudes between students and entrepreneurs under the slippery slope framework. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200, 464-482.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.017

Bezerra, T. V. S., Dos Santos, D. B., Cabral, J. E. O., Nogueira, E. S. (2021, outubro). Ação de Conformidade como uma Inovação na Administração Pública Brasileira. In: Anuais do IX Simpósio Internacional de Gestão, Projetos, Inovação e Sustentabilidade (IX SINGEP), São Paulo/SP, Brasil.

Budak, T. (2012). Power and trust as determinants of voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence for the slippery slope framework from Turkey. African Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 1499-1505. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2157

Bradford, B., Huq, A., Jackson, J., & Roberts, B. (2014). What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa. Regulation & governance, 8(2), 246-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12012

Carvalho, P. B. (2017). Curso de direito tributário. 30. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva.

Castelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (2010). Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470519851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470519851

Castro, L., & Scartascini, C. (2015). Tax compliance and enforcement in the pampas evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 65-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.002

Ceará. (2021, 27 de outubro). Portal Ceará Transparente. Recuperado de https://cearatransparente.ce.gov.br/portal-da-transparencia/despesas/despesas-do-poder-executivo?stats_month_end=12&stats_month_start=1&stats_year=2019&utf8=%E2%9C%93&locale=pt-BR&__=__.

Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2014). Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. (4ª ed.) UK. Palgrave Macmillan Higher Education.

Cremades, L., Isaác, U., Arias, G., & Vargas, E. D. (2015). Cooperative Tax Relationship or Compliance: Current situation in the CIAT member countries of Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa and Asia (Issue March). https://cds.ciat.org/Biblioteca/DocumentosdeTrabajo/2015/2015_WP_2_cooperative_gonzalo_cremades_vargas.pdf

Da Silva, F. P., Guerreiro, R., & Flores, E. (2019). Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: the slippery slope framework in the Brazilian context. International Review of Economics, 66(2), 147-180.

DOI: 10.1007/s12232-019-00321-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00321-0

Eberhartinger, E., & Zieser, M. (2021). The Effects of Cooperative Compliance on Firms’ Tax Risk, Tax Risk Management and Compliance Costs. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 73(1), 125-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-021-00108-6nomics of governance, 3(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010100032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-021-00108-6

Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010100032

Fontes, D. B. (2020). Abordagem comportamental no compliance tributário. In Anais 19 Prêmio de criatividade e inovação da Receita Federal do Brasil. Brasília, DF.

Fortaleza. (2021, 10 de novembro). Portal da Transparência de Fortaleza. Recuperado de https://transparencia.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/arquivos_pdfs/sepog/LOA/LIVRO_LOA_2019_FINAL.pdf.

Franzoni, L. A. (1998). Tax evasion and tax compliance. Recuperado de http://encyclo.findlaw.com/6020book.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.137430

Gangl, K., Muehlbacher, S., de Groot, M., Goslinga, S., Hofmann, E., Kogler, C.,& Kirchler, E. (2013). " How can I help you?" Perceived service orientation of tax authorities and tax compliance. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522113X675683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2271574

Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax authorities' interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust. New ideas in psychology, 37, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001

Gangl, K., Hartl, B., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2019). The relationship between Austrian tax auditors and self-employed taxpayers: Evidence from a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01034

Gribnau, Hans, Horizontal Monitoring: Some Procedural Tax Law Issues (January 21, 2015). in R. Russo (ed.), Tax Assurance, Deventer: Kluwer 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2608841

Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Pantya, J., Belianin, A., & Kirchler, E. (2013). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: Testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.010

Haughton, D., Legrand, P., & Woolford, S. (2009). Review of three latent class cluster analysis packages: Latent Gold, poLCA, and MCLUST. The American Statistician, 63(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.0016

Huiskers-Stoop, E., & Gribnau, H. (2019). Cooperative compliance and the Dutch horizontal monitoring model. Journal of Tax Administration, 5, 1. Recuperado de http://jota.website/index.php/JoTA/article/view/219

Ibrahim, F. Z. (2011). Curso de direito previdenciário. Niteroi-RJ. Impetus.

Kastlunger, B., Kirchler, E., Mittone, L., & Pitters, J. (2009). Sequences of audits, tax compliance, and taxpaying strategies. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.10.004

Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic psychology, 29(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

Kirchler, E., & Wahl, I. (2010). Tax compliance inventory TAX-I: Designing an inventory for surveys of tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.002

Lanza, S. T., Collins, L. M., Lemmon, D. R., & Schafer, J. L. (2007). PROC LCA: A SAS procedure for latent class analysis. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 14(4), 671-694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575602

Laureano, R.M.S. (2011). Testes de hipóteses com o SPSS: o meu manual de consulta rápida. Lisboa. Edições Sílabo.

Lemoine, J., & Roland-Lévy, C. (2012). From the slippery slope framework to responsive regulation. Creating communities: local, national and global, London: CICE, 727-739.

Lozza, E., Kastlunger, B., Tagliabue, S., & Kirchler, E. (2013). The relationship between political ideology and attitudes toward tax compliance: The case of Italian taxpayers. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.108

Machado, H. B. (2010). Curso de Direito Tributário. São Paulo – SP: Malheiros.

Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian journal of marketing research, 20(1), 36-43.

Minayo, M. C. D. S., & Sanches, O. (1993). Quantitativo-qualitativo: oposição ou complementaridade?. Cadernos de saúde pública, 9(3), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X1993000300002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X1993000300002

Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E., & Schwarzenberger, H. (2011). Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence for the “slippery slope” framework. European Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9236-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9236-9

OCDE. (2008). Study into the Role of Tax Intermediaries. Paris. OECD Publishing. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/tax/administration/39882938.pdf

OCDE. (2010). Tax Compliance and Tax Accounting Systems, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration. Paris. OECD Publishing. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/tax/forum-on-tax-administration/publications-and-products/45045662.pdf

OCDE. (2013). Co-operative compliance: a framework: from enhanced relationship to co-operative compliance. Paris. OECD Publishing. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/publications/co-operative-compliance-a-framework-9789264200852-en.htm

Owens, J. (2012). Tax administrators, taxpayers and their advisors: can the dynamics of the relationship be changed. Bulletin for international taxation, 516-518. Recuperado de https://www.wu.ac.at/fileadmin/wu/d/i/taxlaw/institute/staff/publications/bifd091206.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/1cgqz6q

Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 28(4), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01708.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01708.x

RFB. (2020, 30 de setembro). Portaria RFB nº 4820, de 19 de novembro de 2020. Aprova o Manual Eletrônico do Sigilo Fiscal da Secretaria Especial da Receita Federal do Brasil (e-MSF). Recuperado de http://normas.receita.fazenda.gov.br/sijut2consulta/consulta.action

Russo, R. (2019). Risk management, internal control and cooperative compliance in taxation. In The Future of Risk Management, Volume I (pp. 329-350). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14548-4_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14548-4_14

Simone, L., Sansing, R. C., & Seidman, J. K. (2013). When are enhanced relationship tax compliance programs mutually beneficial?. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1971-1991. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50525

Solichin, M. R., & Astuti, S. (2021). Tax Payment Intention using Theory of Planned Behavior Approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.32639/jiak.v10i1.723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32639/jiak.v10i1.723

Szudoczky, R., & Majdanska, A. (2017). Designing co-operative compliance programmes: lessons from the EU State aid rules for tax administrations. British Tax Review, (2), 204-229. Recuperado de https://link.library.ibfd.org/portal/Designing-co-operative-compliance-programmes-/uE9dW5rZ-DI/

Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three‐process theory. European journal of social psychology, 35(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.244

Tyler, Tom R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton - Nova Jérsei. Princeton university press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828609

Ventry Jr, D. J. (2008). Cooperative Tax Regulation, 41 Conn. L. Rev, 431, 461-62. Recuperado de https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/302394401.pdf

Viol, A. L. (2015). A administração tributária moderna e a maximização do cumprimento tributário: algumas reflexões sobre o caso brasileiro. Revista da Receita Federal: estudos tributários e aduaneiros, 1(2), 50-82. Recuperado de https://www.gov.br/receitafederal/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/revistas/revista-da-receita-federal/2015-revista-de-estudos-tributarios-e-aduaneiros-da-receita-federal-1.pdf

Wahl, Ingrid; Kastlunger, Barbara; Kirchler, Erich. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax compliance: an empirical analysis of the “Slippery Slope Framework”. Law & Policy, 32(4),383-406. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00327.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00327.x

Warren, N. (2018). Estimating tax gag is everything to an informed response to the digital era. eJTR, 16, 536. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3200838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3200838

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Bezerra, T. V. S., Oliveira, O. V. de, & Souza, L. L. F. de. (2024). Tax Compliance Actions by Tax Authorities and Voluntary Compliance with Tax Obligations by Individual Taxpayers. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 17(1), 040–054/055. https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2024170103

Issue

Section

ARTICLES